By Jeremy Felt

SSL remains fairly terrifying


Moxie Marlinspike‘s presentation on SSL Stripping, while 5 years old, is both fascinating and terrifying. I’m not sure I’ll ever turn my secure VPN off again. At the same time, I’m not sure if it really does me any good.

The 55 minutes of his talk are very much worth it. Some moments from the video:

“when looking for security vulnerabilities … it’s good to start with places where developers probably don’t really know what they’re doing but feel really about the solutions they’ve come up with.”

“A padlock, who’d of thought … it doesn’t inspire security.”

“[EV Certs]: Now we’re supposed to pay extra for the Certificate Authorities to do the thing they were supposed to do to begin with.”

And the most important to remember, which is also the least assuring:

“Lots of times the security of HTTPS comes down to the security of HTTP, and HTTP is not secure.”

Major props to Zack, who prodded me to watch this many times before I finally ran into it again today.

CC by 2.0 licensed photograph by minhocos

Amazon’s petition for exemption to fly drones commercially


Amazon filed a petition for exemption with the FAA last week so that they could fly prototype drones outdoors as part of research and development for their future Prime Air offering. It’s a quick read, with a couple fun points:

Because Amazon is a commercial enterprise we have been limited to conducting R&D flights indoors or in other countries.


We will effectively operate our own private model airplane field, but with additional safeguards that go far beyond those that FAA has long-held provide a sufficient level of safety for public model airplane fields – and only with sUAS.

It’s pretty amazing to think that Amazon would have made this much progress—eight or nine generations—without flying anything outside. One of the items listed in their request was the mention that their drones flew up to 50mph with 5lb payloads. How big is this facility that they’re testing in?

Or is this a lie that many working on serious commercial efforts with drones right now is telling?


Finding the source of research news


A researcher at Washington State University had a role in some interesting news that came out yesterday. We published a great writeup: “Major study documents benefits of organic farming“. Newcastle University published a release: “New study finds significant differences between organic and non-organic food“. Large news organizations such as The Guardian and The New York Times provided a good digestion of the results.

Alas, a comment on Hacker News summed up my feelings on many of these:

There is no link to the paper or a preprint of the article.

Often when I read news like this, I want to dive in and at least skim the published research. But this is where our various content management systems break down the most.

Even though this paper is licensed under the very open Creative Commons CC by 3.0, which allows me to share and even build on the material as long as I provide proper attribution—it’s a horrible process to find.

At WSU News, our article included contact information for the researcher but no direct link to the paper or even the primary university’s release. In Newcastle’s release, a page is linked to that actually includes the full text of the paper, but the name doesn’t match the title and is a somewhat confusing experience. This is much better than many, as the paper is at least accessible. In the New York Times, the article links to the abstract at the National Center for Biotechnology Information. This abstract has a link for the full text at Cambridge Journals Online, where it isn’t actually published yet but will be on July 15th. The Guardian provides a way, but uses the words “several academic websites” to link to two different places. One is the same NCBI abstract the NYT links to. The other is at Research Gate, which actually has a link to the full paper but includes a really confusing order form in the first two pages of the PDF so that you aren’t actually sure what you’re looking at.

The best page I’ve found yet is actually another at WSU. Chuck Benbrook, the researcher involved with the study, published an article that links to a full page of resources, including the full text of the paper and supplemental data.

I guess the most discouraging part of this is the wide open license on the paper. It gets much harder to track things down when a paper is published in a paid journal. I’m lucky in that I work for a university. If I want access to a paper, there is likely a way. The process can be confusing though, especially if you aren’t used to the required jumping around.

To be clear, this is not a gripe on anyone writing the articles. It is a gripe on those of us creating the systems that manage this content.

The part I’m going to push for at WSU is a way to attach source data to these articles in a clear way. Every time an article is written about a piece of research, that research should have a clear space on the page—in the same spot every time—that provides instructions or direct access to a document.

And with that.

Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: a systematic literature review and meta-analyses. Baranski, M., D. Srednicka-Tober, N. Volakakis, C. Seal, R. Sanderson, G. B. Stewart, C. Benbrook, B. Biavati, E. Markellou, C. Giotis, J. Gromadzka-Ostrowska, E. Rembiałkowska, K. Skwarło-Son, R. Tahvonen, D. Janovska, U. Niggli, P. Nicot and C. Leifert.

Links for PFS, DH, DHE, and ECDHE and SSL in general


So many acronyms.

I have many tabs open right now that I’m about to close and I’m not great at bookmarks. Here are some of the things I’ve been reading while trying to figure out PFS in SSL.

And I just bought this book: Bulletproof SSL and TLS


Managing the Environment


This is a brief companion post to the talk I gave yesterday for Web Conference at Penn State 2014. The tagline for the conference was “the future friendly web”, and the talk covered how this web can be created with rapid, incremental improvements with defined workflows around version control, provisioning, deployment, and testing.

It’s a bit interesting that the talk links on the conference site don’t have dates in URL. Let’s see if that web remains future friendly. :)

Thanks to everyone that attended the talk, hopefully there were some good takeaways. Please reach out if you have any questions about any of this.

Slides: Managing the Environment – Web Conference 2014

Useful links from the presentation:


Figuring out how to serve many SSL certificates, part 2.


I’ve been pretty happy over the last couple days with our A+ score at SSL Labs. I almost got discouraged this morning when it was discovered that LinkedIn wasn’t able to pull in the data from our HTTPS links properly when sharing articles.

Their bot, `LinkedInBot/1.0 (compatible; Mozilla/5.0; Jakarta Commons-HttpClient/3.1 +`, uses an end of life HTTP client that happens to also be Java based. One of our warnings in the handshake simulation area was that clients using Java Runtime Environment 6u45 did not support 2048 DH params, something that we were using. I’m not entirely sure if LinkedIn has their JRE updated to 6u45, but I’m guessing that anything below that has the same issue.

I generated a new 1024 bit dhparams file to solve the immediate issue and reloaded nginx without changing any other configs. LinkedIn can now ingest our HTTPS links and we still have an A+ score. :)

Figuring out how to serve many SSL certificates, part 1.


In the process of figuring out how to configure SSL certificates for hundreds (maybe thousands) of domains in a single nginx configuration without a wildcard certificate, I decided it would be cool to use `server_name` as a variable in the nginx configuration:

`ssl_certificate /etc/nginx/ssl/$server_name.crt;`

Unfortunately, per this aptly named request on Server Fault—nginx use $server_name on ssl_certificate path—that’s not allowed.

Nginx docs explain it more:

Variables are evaluated in the run-time during the processing of each request, so they are rather costly compared to plain static configuration.

So with that, I’m going to have to generate a bunch of `server {}` blocks that point to the correct certificate and key files before including a common config. I can’t find any examples of this yet, so I’m still wondering if there’s a better way.


I’m about to create a repository named something like WSUWP-P2-Common that contains all common P2 related plugins and/or themes for use throughout the WSUWP ecosystem.

It’s purpose will be more of a built package rather than a development area. Development will still occur in individual repositories. When releases are pushed in those repositories, they can be deployed to the central package repository as well.

I feel like I’m reinventing the wheel though and that if I understood Composer enough, I could use that. But then part of me doesn’t care if I’m reinventing the wheel because it will just work with our current deploy process without much effort.

I also wonder if this is better of as a private repository. I guess if we run into a plugin that isn’t GPL compatible for some reason, we can create a separate repository for WSUWP-P2-Common-Private, but I’m hoping that isn’t the case.

If this works as a model, we’ll likely have other “package” repos in the near future for other sites.

#5367 WordPress Cookie Authentication Vulnerability


#5367 WordPress Cookie Authentication Vulnerability takes us back to when the modern password handling in WordPress was born, partially due to a vulnerability report at the time. More because we were ready for it.  It’s great to read through and watch decisions being made as familiarity grew.

In that thread, Matt links to the changeset that brought us from plain text passwords to hashed passwords for the first time.